[attachmentid=16353]
QUOTE(robben @ May 10 2005, 11:39 AM)
AMD's dual-core Opteron processors are extremely well executed on all fronts, based on what we've seen. AMD's dual-core design has a technical elegance that Intel's can't match, and that design brings superior performance. One Opteron 175 performs slightly better than a pair of Opteron 248s running at the same clock speed, and it does so while consuming less power than a single-core Opteron 152. All in all, very impressive.
...
So who should get a Dual-Core CPU? Well, if you read the article, you’d know that the answer is everyone – by the end of the year, when things move from the workstation to the home desktop. How about right now? Well, people who’ve always looked to dual processor machines (IT infrastructure, custom software, digital media) should strongly consider these new systems. Professional photographers who regular work with hundreds to thousands of images a day with cameras such as the 1Ds or 1D Mark II from should strongly consider getting a Dual Opteron system as their next upgrade. It truly is the “hardware accelerated RAW processor” that many have dreamed of.
Non avete letto abbastanza e comunque i processori sono già in commercio, i test sono già stati fatti.. proprio con le eos e nikon compresa la d2x
..
se non vi documentate o non ne avete voglia vi posto io il tutto.. anche se non ritengo giusto che se a uno gli interessa non possa con le sue forze farlo da solo.
Time to Process a Nikon D2H NEF (shorter is better)
[attachmentid=16353]
Time to Process a Nikon D2X NEF (shorter is better)
[attachmentid=16354]